Port 520Routing Information Protocol (RIP)
Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is one of the oldest distance-vector routing protocols, widely used in small and medium-sized networks. It facilitates the sharing of routing information among routers, enabling consistent and automated updating of routing tables in an IP network environment. Known for its simplicity and ease of configuration, RIP plays an essential role in dynamic routing, though it has largely been superseded by more advanced protocols in larger or more complex network infrastructures..
- transport
- udp
- in transit
- cleartext
- assignment
- official
- risk
- 4/10
- lookups
- 9,138
single transport
payload readable on path
registered with iana
caution
rank 532 of 993 · top 54%
1 other service is registered on port 520. compare all 2 →
Technical Details
what runs on :520Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is a distance-vector dynamic routing protocol standardized originally in RFC 1058. RIP uses hop count as its routing metric, with a maximum allowable hop count of 15 to prevent routing loops. Routes with a hop count greater than 15 are considered unreachable, an intentional design decision to avoid infinite loops in the network. RIP periodically broadcasts the full routing table every 30 seconds to neighboring routers, which may lead to slow convergence times when network changes occur.
Operating primarily over UDP port 520, RIP packets carry information about the entire routing table rather than incremental updates, contributing to unnecessary bandwidth usage in larger environments. The simplicity of RIP makes it easy to implement and manage, favoring networks with straightforward routing requirements and limited size. Over time, RIP has evolved, with RIP version 2 introducing support for subnet mask information, authentication, and multicast routing updates, addressing some of the limitations of the original protocol.
Despite its prevalence in earlier network deployments, RIP's limitations — such as lack of support for VLSM (in version 1), slow convergence, and susceptibility to routing loops — have led to its displacement by more sophisticated protocols like OSPF and EIGRP in larger and high-performance networks. However, RIP remains suitable for educational purposes and simple routing scenarios due to its ease of understanding and deployment.
Security Information
exposure of :520risk score
4/ 10caution
worth attention. how exposed you are depends on configuration — don't leave it reachable from the internet without a reason.
network services averages 3.9 across 604 ports — this one sits 0.1 above.
in transit
cleartext
credentials and payloads are readable by anyone on path
assignment
official
registered with iana for this service — scanners fingerprint it by number
reachable over
udp
udp is connectionless — source addresses are trivially spoofed and it is a reflection favourite
security overview
Common Vulnerabilities:
- RIP lacks inherent strong security features, especially in version 1, which transmits routing updates in plain text and without authentication, exposing the network to risks such as route injection and spoofing.
- Attackers can perform RIP spoofing attacks by advertising incorrect routing information, potentially causing man-in-the-middle attacks, black holes, or network segmentation.
- Because RIP uses broadcast or multicast routing updates, these packets can be easily intercepted and manipulated if the network is not properly segmented or access-controlled.
Common Mitigations:
- Employ RIP version 2 with password authentication enabled to mitigate unauthorized route updates, but note that this authentication is weak (plain text) and should be coupled with other protections.
- Utilize network segmentation and access control lists (ACLs) on routers to limit RIP traffic to trusted interfaces and neighboring routers only.
- Implement infrastructure encryption such as IPsec tunnels between routers to protect the integrity and confidentiality of routing information.
- Consider migration to more secure and robust routing protocols that provide authentication and encryption natively, such as OSPF with cryptographic authentication.
- Regularly monitor routing tables and network paths to quickly detect anomalous route advertisements and potential security breaches.
Related Ports
the 8 most looked-up other ports in network services — 604 ports carry that label.
| port | service | risk | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| :9080 | Groove RPC | TCPUDP | Web Services | caution | 70.8k |
| :6543 | Jetnet | UDP | Network Services | caution | 65.3k |
| :5938 | TeamViewer | TCPUDP | Remote Access | caution | 65.0k |
| :8291 | Winbox MikroTik Admin | TCP | Security | caution | 62.9k |
| :3233 | WhiskerControl Protocol | TCPUDP | Network Services | caution | 61.9k |
| :3268 | Microsoft Global Catalog (GC) | TCPUDP | Security | caution | 54.6k |
| :135 | Microsoft EPMAP | TCPUDP | Security | caution | 51.9k |
| :3128 | Tatsoft Default HTTP Proxy | TCP | Web Services | caution | 46.8k |
risk mix of the 8 listed
- caution100%
0 of 8 encrypted