whatportis.com
suggest an edit →

Port 384Remote Server System

Port 384 is designated for a Remote Network Server System protocol that supports communication between remote clients and network-based servers. This port facilitates remote configuration, monitoring, and management tasks, often enabling system administrators to perform crucial operations without direct physical access. It is an official port assignment that is known for its versatility in enabling remote network services across various environments..

inRemote AccessNetwork Services
transport
tcp · udp

2 transports registered

in transit
cleartext

payload readable on path

assignment
official

registered with iana

risk
4/10

caution

lookups
11,473

rank 356 of 993 · top 36%

Technical Details

what runs on :384

Port 384 is officially assigned for a Remote Network Server System, which typically provides services enabling remote access, control, and administration of network servers. The protocol operating over this port may facilitate bidirectional communication enabling real-time management capabilities. Such communication often includes authentication, configuration commands, monitoring status updates, and potentially software or firmware updates.

Technically, the service on port 384 can utilize both TCP and UDP. TCP allows for reliable, connection-oriented transactions crucial for executing commands and ensuring delivery, whereas UDP might be utilized for lightweight status broadcasts or discovery packets. This dual-protocol support provides flexibility depending on the specific use-case scenario and network conditions.

The Remote Network Server System protocol might employ basic or application-specific security controls. It’s imperative to implement secure authentication mechanisms to prevent unauthorized access, and the design typically integrates with other network services, enabling streamlined system integrations and remote management over potentially sizable distributed environments.

Security Information

exposure of :384

risk score

4/ 10caution

worth attention. how exposed you are depends on configuration — don't leave it reachable from the internet without a reason.

remote access averages 4.0 across 110 ports — this one sits level with it.

in transit

cleartext

credentials and payloads are readable by anyone on path

assignment

official

registered with iana for this service — scanners fingerprint it by number

reachable over

tcp · udp

udp is connectionless — source addresses are trivially spoofed and it is a reflection favourite

security overview

Common vulnerabilities on port 384 stem from weak authentication, lack of encryption, and misconfiguration, which can allow malicious actors unauthorized access to remote server controls. Attackers might exploit default credentials, unpatched protocol weaknesses, or utilize man-in-the-middle techniques if communication is unencrypted. Exposure on public networks can dramatically increase these risks, sometimes resulting in unauthorized data access, lateral movement, or privilege escalation.

Mitigations involve implementing strong, multi-factor authentication, utilizing VPNs or secure tunnels to restrict access to trusted entities only, and disabling the port externally when remote administration isn’t required. Additionally, applying strict access controls, regular patching, and monitoring for unusual connection attempts or anomalous traffic patterns are vital. Where possible, encrypt management traffic using TLS or SSH-based wrappers to safeguard communications on this port.

Related Ports

all 110 in remote access →

the 8 most looked-up other ports in remote access — 110 ports carry that label.

portservicerisk
:8000Intel Remote Desktop / Alternate HTTP Portsafe
:8888D2GS Admin Consolecaution
:8881Atlasz Secure Servercaution
:5938TeamViewercaution
:8291Winbox MikroTik Admincaution
:8008IBM HTTP Server Admincaution
:135Microsoft EPMAPcaution
:23Telnetcaution

risk mix of the 8 listed

  • safe13%
  • caution88%

0 of 8 encrypted